Certified Compliance and Ethics Professional (CCEP) Certification Practice Exam

In this scenario, comparing the content outline with other organizations is an effective next step for a compliance professional. This approach allows the professional to benchmark against industry standards and best practices, ensuring that the Code of Conduct is relevant, comprehensive, and aligned with current compliance requirements. By reviewing how similar organizations structure their codes, the compliance professional can identify any gaps or updates that need to be addressed in their own Code, particularly in light of the significant changes suggested by HR.

This method not only promotes collaboration and shared insights within the industry but also helps to ensure that the Code is reflective of not just internal expectations, but also external regulatory and ethical standards. Engaging in this comparative analysis further positions the compliance program to proactively respond to evolving ethical and legal expectations.

While the other options might seem viable, they do not directly address the immediate need for a thorough understanding of how the organization's Code aligns with broader practices. Requesting guidance from the board may be premature without first assessing the current state relative to industry norms. Contracting with a consultant could be beneficial later but would be more effective after conducting an internal review. Likewise, rewriting based on Federal Sentencing Guidelines is critical but ideally informed by comparative insights and the specific suggestions from HR.